project #7

did wells =
good energy and engaging animation, natural smile, good interesting topic, nice stats to back up facts, good audience involvement and humour.

25% of listeners commented they now want one (50% of audience already had one).

next times =
more RESEARCH in the research speech.
10 points is too many. consider limiting points to 3.
define all terms i.e. shuffle
also the intro was not attn grabbing since stmts were long and read rather than spoken

timer noted 6:58, i-pod memo 7:18.
too many crackles from moving it.

also, when i re-printed this morning for a larger font i neglected a key paragraph. BUT AT LEAST I DIDN'T ANNOUNCE THIS GLITCH in public when i realized it. and i think i managed to build in the missing facts off the cuff.